

Nobody is saying this is cannibalism- we're saying "see also cannibalism". It's a "see also", and the link is so obvious that it needs to be there. see also is for linked or related concepts, which this clearly is. Some random personal website isn't a reliable source. William Ortiz ( talk) 14:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC) The sources and content fail WP:V or WP:RS.The overall article is the same, but is now up-to-date. I also rewrote some information, as well as deleting unneeded ones. Nuclear Vacuum 00:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC) I just gave the article a "clean up." I personally browsed the internet to find confirming resources and data. Allow me some time, and I assure that this article will be up-to-date and unneeded to be erased. Please do not erase or delete any information on this, article simply because the reference is not up-to-date. So the current references are best to describe this article, until new ones can be obtained. But since vore is a relatively new fetish on the web, articles are scarce. All information on this article is referenced and up to date. I want to discuss the two recent deletions of this article.
